N.º 33 (2025): Out - Dez
Artigo Original

Patient Experience on Oncological Treatments Assessed through the LifeCare Mobile Application: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study

Faiza Ahmed Aldalali
Serviço de Oncologia - Unidade Local Saúde Algarve
Paulo Luz
Serviço de Oncologia - Unidade Local Saúde Algarve

Publicado 04/11/2026

Palavras-chave

  • Patient experience,
  • PREMs,
  • mHealth,
  • Oncology,
  • Natural language processing

Como Citar

1.
Ahmed Aldalali F, Luz P. Patient Experience on Oncological Treatments Assessed through the LifeCare Mobile Application: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study. Alg Med [Internet]. 11 de abril de 2026 [citado 18 de abril de 2026];(33):12-7. Disponível em: https://algarvemedico.org/index.php/am/article/view/25

Resumo

Patient- reported experience measures (PREM) are essential for quality assessment in oncology care, often differing from clinician perceptions. Mobile health (mHealth) applications enable systematic capture of patient perspectives in routine practice. We assessed cancer patients' willingness to repeat oncological treatment and explored underlying reasons using the LifeCare mobile application in a cross- sectional pilot study of 16 users. Patients responded to: "Taking into account what has been explained to you about your disease and treatment, and your personal experience, would you undergo this treatment again?" (options: "No, never"; "Maybe"; "Yes, I would undergo this treatment again") with free- text justification. Natural language processing analyzed open responses. Median age was 56 years; 62.5% (10/16) female. Tumor distribution: breast 43.8% (n=7), colon 18.8% (n=3), lung 18.8% (n=3), others 18.8% (n=3). Overall, 62.5% (10/16) answered "Yes", 25.0% (4/16) "Maybe", 12.5% (2/16) "No, never". NLP identified six dominant themes for affirmative responses (disease control 40%, survival 20%), three for ambivalent responses, and three for negative responses (toxicity, disease progression). LifeCare enabled structured PREM capture revealing treatment acceptability determinants. Mobile health with NLP shows promise for scalable patient- centered oncology care.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

  1. Basch E. Patient-reported outcomes—harnessing patients' voices to improve clinical care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:105-108.
  2. Darzi A. High quality care for all: NHS next stage review. UK Department of Health; 2008.
  3. Greenhalgh J, Meadows K. The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in clinical practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49(440):215-220.
  4. Howell D, Harth T, Brown J, Bennett C, Boyko S. Self-management education interventions for patients with cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(4):1323-1355.
  5. Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, Nicolaou-Galitis O, Felix A, Balla I, et al. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care? An overview of tools and benefits. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(10):1986-1994.
  6. Absolom K, Holch P, Warrington L, Megson J, Pikoulis E, Cropley L, et al. Phase 2 pilot trial of real-time automated telephone reporting of chemotherapy toxicities in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer. 2017;123(20):4007-4015.
  7. Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P, et al. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):557-565.
  8. Maramba I, Chatterjee S, Newman C. Methods of usability testing for the design of medical devices. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(11):e14981.
  9. Bird S, Klein E, Loper E. Natural Language Processing with Python: Analyzing Text with the Natural Language Toolkit. O'Reilly Media; 2009.
  10. Zhang D, Narayan S, Sze S, Gong Y, Zhou L. Using NLP to analyse patient feedback: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e073241.
  11. Lizee T, Barreau C, Goehring C, Goronflot T, Dohollou N, Fabre A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes during immunotherapy. Cancer Med. 2021;10(19):6671-6680.
  12. Snyder CF, Jensen RE, Segal JB, Wu AW. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs): challenges and future directions. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1697-1702.
  13. Eton DT, Elraiyah TA, Yost KJ, Tolosa FJK, Ting HH, Montori VM. A systematic review of patient-reported measures of burden of treatment in chronic illness. Am J Manag Care. 2017;23(10):e308-e317.
  14. Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):24-29.
  15. Kraus S, Feuerriegel S. Sentiment analysis in health communication. J Biomed Inform. 2020;112:103599.
  16. Montazeri A. Quality of life data as predictive indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7(1):102.
  17. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.
  18. Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Dueck AC, Basch E, Cella D, Reilly CM, et al. Recommended patient-reported core outcome domains for assessing benefits and harms of cancer immunotherapy. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018;2(4):pky055.